Marginalization and cosmopolitanism: contemporary views on social consequences of spatial relocation intensification
PDF (Русский)

Keywords

migration
marginality
the stranger
social identity
national state
mobility
marginalization
cosmopolitanism
tourism
spatial movements

How to Cite

ГусевА. (2011). Marginalization and cosmopolitanism: contemporary views on social consequences of spatial relocation intensification. Russian Sociological Review, 8(2), 72-79. Retrieved from https://ojs.hse.ru/index.php/sociologica/article/view/445

Abstract

The contemporary sociologists' views on such issues as social identification diffusion, marginalization and decadence of national states are the subject of a current paper. Author's point of view is a bit unusual: all the above-mentioned processes are analyzed as consequences of movement in a physical space; however, the movement is no doubt a social fact (but not geographic or physical). The order of sociologists' positions examining is logical: first examined author is Zygmunt Bauman, whose works unveil the most abstract and ontological foundations of the marginalization process. Anthony Giddens and Ulrich Beck are the next: the level of their theoretical constructions is a bit more grounded. The paper is finalized with the John Urry's views analysis: his mobile sociology is crucial in the frame of current topic, however, theoretically distant from previous sociologists.
PDF (Русский)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.