Role of the Lateral Asymmetry in Response Inhibition Task in Event-Related Potentials Components
Keywords:
cognitive control, event-related potentials, Go/NoGo, handedness, eye dominanc
Abstract
The research is dedicated to the issue of realization of inhibition as the function of cognitive control in people with various characteristics of lateral asymmetry – right or left hand or eye dominance. Groups of the subjects with right or left dominant eye, as well as right- or lefthanded solved the problems of Go/NoGo of various perceptual complexity. As a result, significant differences were found in the amplitude of components of evoked potentials N200 and P300. The differences in the amplitude N200 in the right temporal lead were found between the subjects with the right and left vectors of lateral asymmetry in 2 tasks in both conditions (Go and NoGo) in the lead T6, and they may speak for the independence of color processing of stimuli from the need to inhibit the response, as well as for the fact that in the early stage of processing the stimuli there are differences in color processing. The differences in the amplitude of the component P300 are seen in a wide range of leads and may be linked to perceptual complexity of the visual stimuli. The usage of cognitive control responses varies in groups with right and left vectors of lateral asymmetry. In the task where the relevant stimuli are out of the context, more differences are registered in the condition that demands inhibition of the irrelevant response (NoGo); in the task where stimuli are integrated in the context, more differences are registered in the condition that doesn’t demand the inhibition (Go). This fact speaks for the differences in performance of control in subjects with various types of lateral asymmetry, when they answer various types of stimuli.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Alvarez, J. A., & Emory, E. (2006). Executive function and the frontal lobes: A meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology Review, 16(1), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-006-9002-x.
2. Barnett, K. J. (2008). Colour knowledge: The role of the right hemisphere in colour processing and object colour knowledge. Laterality, 13(5), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802146387
3. Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90011-4
4. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A. D., Kyprianou, M., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Investigation of the link between higher order cognitive functions and handedness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.778231
5. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Nanou, E. D., Hountala, C., Maganioti, A. E., Capsalis, C. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2009). Effect of initiation-inhibition and handedness on the patterns of the P50 event-related potential component: A low resolution electromagnetic tomography study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51. Retrieved from http://behavioralandbrainfunctions.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51
6. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2010). Effect of handedness on Stroop Colour Word Task. Laterality, 15(6), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903071104
7. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(12), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5
8. Bruin, K. J., & Wijers, A. A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(7), 1172-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
9. Bryden, P. J., Bruyn, J., & Fletcher, P. (2005). Handedness and health: An examination of the association between different handedness classifications and health disorders. Laterality, 10(5), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000193
10. Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005
11. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R.J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined Go/Nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51(2), 877-887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043
12. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K
13. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301-8306.
14. Halpern, D. F., Haviland, M. G., & Killian, C. D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the medical college admission test. Brain and Cognition, 38(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1021
15. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Henninghausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksentask: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(4), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218
16. Ilyina, M. N., & Ilyin, E. P. (1975). Ob odnom iz uslovii diagnostirovaniya sily nervnoi sistemy po vozbuzhdeniyu s pomoshch’yu tepping-testa [On the one condition of diagnostics of the power of nervous system with the arousal in tapping test]. In Psikhofiziologicheskie osobennosti sportivnoi deyatel’nosti: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Psychophysiological characteristics of sport activity: Collected works] (pp. 183-186). Leningrad: LGPI.
17. Jorgenson, C., Davis, J., Opella, J., & Angerstein, G. (1980). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: an examination of gender, hand-preference, and language differences. International Journal of Neuroscience, 11(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458009147582
18. Khomskaya, E. D., Privalova, N. N., Enikolopova, E. V., Efimova, I. V., Stepanova, O. B., & Gorina, I. S. (1995). Metody otsenki mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii i mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Methods of assessment of hemispheric asymmetry and hemispheric intercommunication]. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
19. Kok, A. (1999). Varieties of inhibition: Manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 101(2-3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00003-7
20. Lazarev, I. E., & Kirenskaya, A. V. (2008). The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials. Human Physiology, 34(2), 150-160.
21. Lewin, J., Kohen, D., & Mathew, G. (1993). Handedness in mental handicap: Investigation into populations of Down’s syndrome, epilepsy and autism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), 674-676. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.163.5.674
22. Li, L., Gratton, C., Yao. D., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans. Brain Research, 1344, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.016
23. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach, & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
25. Perelle, I. B., & Ehrman, L. (1994). An international study of human handedness: The data. Behavior Genetics, 24(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067189
26. Serrien, D. J., & Sovijärvi-Spapé, M. M. (2013). Cognitive control of response inhibition and switching: hemispheric lateralization and hand preference. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.013
27. Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is taskdependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224-232.
2. Barnett, K. J. (2008). Colour knowledge: The role of the right hemisphere in colour processing and object colour knowledge. Laterality, 13(5), 456-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802146387
3. Benbow, C. P. (1986). Physiological correlates of extreme intellectual precocity. Neuropsychologia, 24(5), 719-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90011-4
4. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A. D., Kyprianou, M., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Investigation of the link between higher order cognitive functions and handedness. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.778231
5. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Nanou, E. D., Hountala, C., Maganioti, A. E., Capsalis, C. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2009). Effect of initiation-inhibition and handedness on the patterns of the P50 event-related potential component: A low resolution electromagnetic tomography study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5(51). https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51. Retrieved from http://behavioralandbrainfunctions.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1744-9081-5-51
6. Beratis, I. N., Rabavilas, A., Papadimitriou, G. N., & Papageorgiou, C. (2010). Effect of handedness on Stroop Colour Word Task. Laterality, 15(6), 597-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500903071104
7. Bokura, H., Yamaguchi, S., & Kobayashi, S. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task. Clinical Neurophysiology, 112(12), 2224-2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00691-5
8. Bruin, K. J., & Wijers, A. A. (2002). Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: A comparative event-related potential study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(7), 1172-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
9. Bryden, P. J., Bruyn, J., & Fletcher, P. (2005). Handedness and health: An examination of the association between different handedness classifications and health disorders. Laterality, 10(5), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500442000193
10. Donkers, F. C. L., & van Boxtel, G. J. M. (2004). The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain and Cognition, 56(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005
11. Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C., & Huster, R.J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined Go/Nogo and stop-signal task. NeuroImage, 51(2), 877-887, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.043
12. Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N. A., Kiroj, V. N., Hoormann, J., & Hohnsbein, J. (1995). Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96(1), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K
13. Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., & Stein, E. A. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: An event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301-8306.
14. Halpern, D. F., Haviland, M. G., & Killian, C. D. (1998). Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: Evidence from the medical college admission test. Brain and Cognition, 38(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1998.1021
15. Heil, M., Osman, A., Wiegelmann, J., Rolke, B., & Henninghausen, E. (2000). N200 in the Eriksentask: Inhibitory executive process? Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(4), 218-225. https://doi.org/10.1027//0269-8803.14.4.218
16. Ilyina, M. N., & Ilyin, E. P. (1975). Ob odnom iz uslovii diagnostirovaniya sily nervnoi sistemy po vozbuzhdeniyu s pomoshch’yu tepping-testa [On the one condition of diagnostics of the power of nervous system with the arousal in tapping test]. In Psikhofiziologicheskie osobennosti sportivnoi deyatel’nosti: Sbornik nauchnykh rabot [Psychophysiological characteristics of sport activity: Collected works] (pp. 183-186). Leningrad: LGPI.
17. Jorgenson, C., Davis, J., Opella, J., & Angerstein, G. (1980). Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of Stroop stimuli: an examination of gender, hand-preference, and language differences. International Journal of Neuroscience, 11(3), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207458009147582
18. Khomskaya, E. D., Privalova, N. N., Enikolopova, E. V., Efimova, I. V., Stepanova, O. B., & Gorina, I. S. (1995). Metody otsenki mezhpolusharnoi asimmetrii i mezhpolusharnogo vzaimodeistviya [Methods of assessment of hemispheric asymmetry and hemispheric intercommunication]. Moscow: Moscow University Press.
19. Kok, A. (1999). Varieties of inhibition: Manifestations in cognition, event-related potentials and aging. Acta Psychologica, 101(2-3), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00003-7
20. Lazarev, I. E., & Kirenskaya, A. V. (2008). The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials. Human Physiology, 34(2), 150-160.
21. Lewin, J., Kohen, D., & Mathew, G. (1993). Handedness in mental handicap: Investigation into populations of Down’s syndrome, epilepsy and autism. British Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), 674-676. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.163.5.674
22. Li, L., Gratton, C., Yao. D., & Knight, R. T. (2010). Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans. Brain Research, 1344, 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.016
23. Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A user’s guide to stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach, & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189-239). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
25. Perelle, I. B., & Ehrman, L. (1994). An international study of human handedness: The data. Behavior Genetics, 24(3), 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067189
26. Serrien, D. J., & Sovijärvi-Spapé, M. M. (2013). Cognitive control of response inhibition and switching: hemispheric lateralization and hand preference. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.04.013
27. Simmonds, D. J., Pekar, J. J., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2008). Meta-analysis of Go/No-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is taskdependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224-232.
Published
2018-11-04
How to Cite
МаракшинаЮ. А., ВартановА. В., & БеспаловБ. И. (2018). Role of the Lateral Asymmetry in Response Inhibition Task in Event-Related Potentials Components. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 14(4), 679-697. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2017-4-679-697
Issue
Section
Articles section
