Домашняя среда и установки по отношению к семье: как они взаимосвязаны?
Ключевые слова:
функциональность и релевантность домашней среды, привязанность к дому, установки по отношению к семье
Аннотация
В статье обсуждается взаимосвязь между дружественностью домашней среды и установками по отношению к семье. Дружественность домашней среды включает в себя три параметра: количество функций, который выполняет дом (его функциональность), соответствие этих функций потребностям его обителей (релевантность) и привязанность к дому. Мы предполагаем, что дружественная домашняя среда вносит позитивный вклад в развитие установок по отношению к семье, а позитивные установки на семью, в свою очередь, предсказывают восприятие образа дома как дружественного места. В исследовании приняло участие 393 респондента: 295 девушек и 98 юношей, студенты различных факультетов НИУ «Высшая школа экономики». Были использованы следующие опросники: опросники Функциональность домашней среды, Релевантность домашней среды (краткая версия), Привязанность к дому и опросник Установки по отношению к семье. Результаты регрессионного анализа показывают, что установки по отношению к семье значимо связаны с такими параметрами домашней среды как Привязанность к дому, Прагматичность, Защищенность, Пластичность, Самопрезентация, Эргономичность и Развитие домашней среды. И, наоборот, установки по отношению к семье значимо предсказывают восприятие практически всех параметров функциональности и релевантности домашней среды. Привязанность к дому взаимно и значимо связана с установками по отношению к семье. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы в дизайне домашней среды, а также в психологическом консультировании для создания индивидуальных профилей предпочитаемой домашней среды и усиления ресурсной функции дома как фактора улучшения внутрисемейного климата.
Скачивания
Данные скачивания пока не доступны.
Литература
1. Bell, P., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
2. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments.
3. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Case, D. (1996). Contributions of journeys away to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(1), 1-15.
4. Cauce, A. M., & Domenech-Rodriguez, M. (2002). Latino families: Myths and realities. In J. M. Contreras, K. A. Kerns, & A. Neal-Barnett (Eds.), Latino children and families in the United States: Current research and future directions (pp. 3-25). New York: Praeger.
5. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Cieraad, I. (2010). Homes from home: Memories and projections. Home Cultures, 7(1), 85-102.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 33-64). New York/London: Plenum Press.
8. Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology. Principles and practice. Colville, WA: Optimal books, 2002.
11. Gold, J. R. (1980). An introduction to behavioral geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Gosling, S. D, Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A Room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 379-398.
13. Graumann, C. F. (1996). Aneignung [Appropriation]. In L. Kruse, C. F. Graumann, & E. O. Lantermann (Eds.), Okologische Psychologie: Ein Handbuch Schtasselbegriffen (pp. 124-130). Weinheim, Germany: Psychologie. (in German)
14. Graumann, C. F. (2002). The phenomenological approach to people-environment studies. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 95-113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Heidegger, M. (1971). Building, dwelling, thinking. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, language and thought (pp. 145-161). New York: Colophon Book.
16. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, II: Northwestern University Press.
17. Ingold, T. (2002). The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.
18. Kahana, E., Lovegreen, L., Kahana, B., & Kahana, M. (2003). Person, environment, and person-environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environmental Behaviour, 35, 434-453.
19. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1992). La trame conjugale. Analyse du couple par son linge. Paris: Nathan. (in French)
20. Khachaturova, M. R. (2011). Hardiness and self-efficacy as personal resources of coping with difficult situations in adaptation education. Psychology in the University, 6, 114-129.
21. Khachaturova, M. R., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2017). The home environment as a resource of coping behaviour in youth. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 14(3), 555-566.
22. Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1985). Experience and use of the dwelling. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 65-86). New York/London: Plenum Press.
23. Kull, K. (2001). Jakob von Uexkuell: An introduction. Semiotica, 134, 1(4), 1-59.
24. Kuller, R. (1980). Architecture and emotions. In B. Mikellides (Ed.), Architecture and people (pp. 97- 100). London: Studio Vista.
25. Kunitsyna, V. N., & Yumkina, E. A. (2012). Semeinyi uklad v social'no-psikhologicheskom aspekte [The family life style in a social-psychological perspective]. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya, 4, 367-367. (in Russian)
26. Lang, A. (1993). Non-Cartesian artefacts in dwelling activities: Steps towards a semiotic ecology. Schweizerische Zeitschriftftar Psychologie, 52(2), 138-147.
27. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207-230.
28. Lijk, K. (1985). Ispol'zovanie domashnego prostranstva, vzaimootnosheniya v sem'e i udovletvorennost' [Using a home space, family relationships, and satisfaction]. In T. Nijt, M. Hejdmets, & Yu. Kruusvall (Eds.), Social'no-psihologicheskie osnovy sredoobrazovaniya [Social-psychological foundations of environmental development] (pp. 277-280). Tallinn: Estonian Branch of the Psychological Society of USSR. (in Russian)
29. Lugo Steidel, A. G., & Contreras, J. M. (2003). A New Familism Scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(3), 312-330.
30. Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York: Longman.
31. Mitin, I. I. (2005). Mythogeography: spatial representations and multiple realities. Communitas, 2, 12- 25.
32. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11-22.
33. Moser, G. (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person-environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351-357.
34. Muchow, M., & Muchow, H. (1980). DerLebensraum des Grossstadtkindes [The lifespace of the urban child]. Bensheim, Germany: Riegel. (in German)
35. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Bochaver, A. A., Dmitrieva, N. S., & Reznichenko, S. I. (2016). Dom kak zhiznennaya sreda cheloveka:psikhologicheskoe issledovanie [Home as a people's living space: a psychological study]. Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (in Russian)
36. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Kuznetsova V. B. (2018). Friendly home and inhabitants' morality: mutual relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 23-48.
37. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Reznichenko, S. I., & Kovaleva, A. I. (2017). The home representation impact on the adopted adolescents' adaptation to the foster families. Klinicheskaya i Spetsial'naya Psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 6(4), 75-89. (in Russian)
38. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Dmitrieva, N. S., Reznichenko, S. I., & Kuznetsova, V. B. (2015). The instrument for assessment of dwelling friendliness: "functionality of home environment" questionnaire. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 36(4), 71-83. (in Russian)
39. Naumova, O. B. (2014). Chastnoe prostranstvo v sisteme tsennostei traditsionnogo obshchestva [The private space in the values system of traditional society]. Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, 4, 77-93. (in Russian)
40. Norris-Baker, C., & Scheidt, R. J. (1990). Place attachment among older residents of a "ghost town": A transactional approach. In R. Selby, K. Antony, J. Choi, & B. Orland (Eds.), Coming of age (pp. 333-342). Oklahoma City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
41. Olaru, G., Witthoft, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2015). Methods matter: testing competing models for designing short-scale big-five assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 56-68.
42. Pedersen, D. (1982). Cross-validation of privacy factors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 57-58.
43. Rapoport, A. (1985). Thinking about home environments. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 255-286). New York/London: Plenum Press.
44. Reznichenko, S., Nartova-Bochaver, S., & Kuznetsova, V. (2016). The instrument for assessment of home attachment. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 13(3), 498-518. (in Russian)
45. Rivlin, L. G. (1990). The significance of home and homelessness. Marriage and Family Review, 15, 39- 56.
46. Robinson, M. B., & Robinson, C. E. (1997). Environmental characteristics associated with residential burglaries of student apartment complexes. Environment and Behavior, 29(5), 657-675.
47. Saegert, S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 287-309). New York/London: Plenum Press.
48. Schiffenbauer, A., Brown, J., Perry, P., Shulack, L., & Zanzola, A. (1977). The relationship between density and crowding: Some architectural modifiers. Environment and Behavior, 9, 3-14.
49. Shumaker, S., & Taylor, R. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. Feimer & E. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 219--256). New York: Praeger.
50. Sixsmith, J. (1986). The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 281-289.
51. Smolova, L. V. (2015). Psikhologiya vzaimodeystviya s okruzhayushchei sredoi (ekologicheskaya psikhologiya) [Psychological study on the person-environment relationship]. Moscow: Flinta. (in Russian)
52. Stokols, D. (1978). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 253-295.
53. Taylor, R. (1988). Human territorial functioning: An empirical, evolutionary perspective on individual and small group territorial cognitions, behaviors and consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Tognoli, J. (1980). Residential environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp, 655-690). New York: Jonh Wiley.
2. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments.
3. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Case, D. (1996). Contributions of journeys away to the definition of home: An empirical study of a dialectical process. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(1), 1-15.
4. Cauce, A. M., & Domenech-Rodriguez, M. (2002). Latino families: Myths and realities. In J. M. Contreras, K. A. Kerns, & A. Neal-Barnett (Eds.), Latino children and families in the United States: Current research and future directions (pp. 3-25). New York: Praeger.
5. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Cieraad, I. (2010). Homes from home: Memories and projections. Home Cultures, 7(1), 85-102.
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Halton, E. (1981). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 33-64). New York/London: Plenum Press.
8. Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person-environment fit theory: conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Gifford, R. (2002). Environmental psychology. Principles and practice. Colville, WA: Optimal books, 2002.
11. Gold, J. R. (1980). An introduction to behavioral geography. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Gosling, S. D, Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A Room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 379-398.
13. Graumann, C. F. (1996). Aneignung [Appropriation]. In L. Kruse, C. F. Graumann, & E. O. Lantermann (Eds.), Okologische Psychologie: Ein Handbuch Schtasselbegriffen (pp. 124-130). Weinheim, Germany: Psychologie. (in German)
14. Graumann, C. F. (2002). The phenomenological approach to people-environment studies. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 95-113). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Heidegger, M. (1971). Building, dwelling, thinking. In M. Heidegger, Poetry, language and thought (pp. 145-161). New York: Colophon Book.
16. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Evanston, II: Northwestern University Press.
17. Ingold, T. (2002). The perception of the environment. Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.
18. Kahana, E., Lovegreen, L., Kahana, B., & Kahana, M. (2003). Person, environment, and person-environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environmental Behaviour, 35, 434-453.
19. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1992). La trame conjugale. Analyse du couple par son linge. Paris: Nathan. (in French)
20. Khachaturova, M. R. (2011). Hardiness and self-efficacy as personal resources of coping with difficult situations in adaptation education. Psychology in the University, 6, 114-129.
21. Khachaturova, M. R., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. K. (2017). The home environment as a resource of coping behaviour in youth. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 14(3), 555-566.
22. Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1985). Experience and use of the dwelling. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 65-86). New York/London: Plenum Press.
23. Kull, K. (2001). Jakob von Uexkuell: An introduction. Semiotica, 134, 1(4), 1-59.
24. Kuller, R. (1980). Architecture and emotions. In B. Mikellides (Ed.), Architecture and people (pp. 97- 100). London: Studio Vista.
25. Kunitsyna, V. N., & Yumkina, E. A. (2012). Semeinyi uklad v social'no-psikhologicheskom aspekte [The family life style in a social-psychological perspective]. Sovremennye Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya, 4, 367-367. (in Russian)
26. Lang, A. (1993). Non-Cartesian artefacts in dwelling activities: Steps towards a semiotic ecology. Schweizerische Zeitschriftftar Psychologie, 52(2), 138-147.
27. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207-230.
28. Lijk, K. (1985). Ispol'zovanie domashnego prostranstva, vzaimootnosheniya v sem'e i udovletvorennost' [Using a home space, family relationships, and satisfaction]. In T. Nijt, M. Hejdmets, & Yu. Kruusvall (Eds.), Social'no-psihologicheskie osnovy sredoobrazovaniya [Social-psychological foundations of environmental development] (pp. 277-280). Tallinn: Estonian Branch of the Psychological Society of USSR. (in Russian)
29. Lugo Steidel, A. G., & Contreras, J. M. (2003). A New Familism Scale for use with Latino populations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(3), 312-330.
30. Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York: Longman.
31. Mitin, I. I. (2005). Mythogeography: spatial representations and multiple realities. Communitas, 2, 12- 25.
32. Morgan, P. (2010). Towards a developmental theory of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 11-22.
33. Moser, G. (2009). Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person-environment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 351-357.
34. Muchow, M., & Muchow, H. (1980). DerLebensraum des Grossstadtkindes [The lifespace of the urban child]. Bensheim, Germany: Riegel. (in German)
35. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Bochaver, A. A., Dmitrieva, N. S., & Reznichenko, S. I. (2016). Dom kak zhiznennaya sreda cheloveka:psikhologicheskoe issledovanie [Home as a people's living space: a psychological study]. Moscow: Pamyatniki istoricheskoi mysli. (in Russian)
36. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., & Kuznetsova V. B. (2018). Friendly home and inhabitants' morality: mutual relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 23-48.
37. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Reznichenko, S. I., & Kovaleva, A. I. (2017). The home representation impact on the adopted adolescents' adaptation to the foster families. Klinicheskaya i Spetsial'naya Psikhologiya [Clinical Psychology and Special Education], 6(4), 75-89. (in Russian)
38. Nartova-Bochaver, S. K., Dmitrieva, N. S., Reznichenko, S. I., & Kuznetsova, V. B. (2015). The instrument for assessment of dwelling friendliness: "functionality of home environment" questionnaire. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 36(4), 71-83. (in Russian)
39. Naumova, O. B. (2014). Chastnoe prostranstvo v sisteme tsennostei traditsionnogo obshchestva [The private space in the values system of traditional society]. Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, 4, 77-93. (in Russian)
40. Norris-Baker, C., & Scheidt, R. J. (1990). Place attachment among older residents of a "ghost town": A transactional approach. In R. Selby, K. Antony, J. Choi, & B. Orland (Eds.), Coming of age (pp. 333-342). Oklahoma City, OK: Environmental Design Research Association.
41. Olaru, G., Witthoft, M., & Wilhelm, O. (2015). Methods matter: testing competing models for designing short-scale big-five assessments. Journal of Research in Personality, 59, 56-68.
42. Pedersen, D. (1982). Cross-validation of privacy factors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 57-58.
43. Rapoport, A. (1985). Thinking about home environments. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 255-286). New York/London: Plenum Press.
44. Reznichenko, S., Nartova-Bochaver, S., & Kuznetsova, V. (2016). The instrument for assessment of home attachment. Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, 13(3), 498-518. (in Russian)
45. Rivlin, L. G. (1990). The significance of home and homelessness. Marriage and Family Review, 15, 39- 56.
46. Robinson, M. B., & Robinson, C. E. (1997). Environmental characteristics associated with residential burglaries of student apartment complexes. Environment and Behavior, 29(5), 657-675.
47. Saegert, S. (1985). The role of housing in the experience of dwelling. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments. Human behavior and environment (Vol. 8, pp. 287-309). New York/London: Plenum Press.
48. Schiffenbauer, A., Brown, J., Perry, P., Shulack, L., & Zanzola, A. (1977). The relationship between density and crowding: Some architectural modifiers. Environment and Behavior, 9, 3-14.
49. Shumaker, S., & Taylor, R. (1983). Toward a clarification of people-place relationships: A model of attachment to place. In N. Feimer & E. Geller (Eds.), Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives (pp. 219--256). New York: Praeger.
50. Sixsmith, J. (1986). The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6, 281-289.
51. Smolova, L. V. (2015). Psikhologiya vzaimodeystviya s okruzhayushchei sredoi (ekologicheskaya psikhologiya) [Psychological study on the person-environment relationship]. Moscow: Flinta. (in Russian)
52. Stokols, D. (1978). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 253-295.
53. Taylor, R. (1988). Human territorial functioning: An empirical, evolutionary perspective on individual and small group territorial cognitions, behaviors and consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Tognoli, J. (1980). Residential environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp, 655-690). New York: Jonh Wiley.
Опубликован
2018-11-08
Как цитировать
Нартова-БочаверС. К., ХачатуроваМ. Р., & БрагинецЕ. И. (2018). Домашняя среда и установки по отношению к семье: как они взаимосвязаны?. Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики, 15(3), 542-561. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2018-3-542-561
Выпуск
Раздел
Статьи выпуска
